doitninetimes (
drunkoffthestars) wrote2005-11-06 12:29 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
devils and angels and hell! Oh my!
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Whenever I see a movie that heavily draws on Christian/Catholic themes/dogma/traditions, I'm always terrified that they are going to mangle it horribly in some way. But I was rather impressed with how they handled the whole "suicide=hell" and then "possibility of redemption" thing. I think my only problem with the whole thing was I don't think that they made it REALLY clear on what redeemed him. I mean, if your going to go with the premise that all suicides go to hell, (and your character commits suicide nearly 3 times over) then I would think that you would be much more clear about what has redeemed your condemned character. But I did like how they set it up as him using his soul as a bargaining chip with Satan for the redemption of Isabelle. I thought that was nicely illustrative of the whole concept of self-sacrifice without expecting a reward. He thought he was going to hell anyway, but he made his death serve some good purpose.
I also thought it was also interesting that they made a distinction between knowing and believing/having faith. I'm not really sure what to do with that one, but I thought it was interesting. Or rather, an interesting twist on the whole "non-belief due to lack of logical proof".
no subject
no subject