Ask a Manager ([syndicated profile] askamanager_feed) wrote2025-06-30 04:03 am

people don’t like my face in the morning, waiting for a new boss to turn things around, and more

Posted by Ask a Manager

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My manager said people don’t like my face in the morning

During a 1:1 with my supervisor, she said something that did not sit well with me. Before saying it, she looked away and told me she couldn’t look at me because it was stupid. Finally, she said that I need to work on being less bitchy when I come in. This threw me off completely, as I’m never bitchy when I walk in. So I asked what she meant. She said it’s not my attitude. It’s my FACE. My face is what other staff members find issue with.

I was beyond confused, so I asked her what that even means. She said that the look on my face when I come in is the equivalent to resting bitch face. This bothers people. So they decided to make a point to mention this to her, and rather than tell them no, she thought it was okay to bring to my attention. Should I bring this to upper management, as it strikes me as horribly unprofessional for my supervisor to say?

If she thought it was so stupid, she could have exercised some independent judgment as your manager and not brought it to you. By sharing it with you, she’s indicating that she thinks it’s something you need to act on. It’s a hallmark of a bad manager to pass along feedback they don’t stand by (unless it’s to say, “I don’t agree with this, but you should be aware it’s come up because of Political Reason X”).

But is there any chance there’s more to it than just your face and she’s just communicating badly? For example, if the culture in your office is to greet people when you pass them in the morning and you’re not doing that, or if you seem like there’s a storm cloud over you until you’re settled with coffee, it’s possible that’s behind it. But if it’s really just your face and nothing else, this is BS.

Either way, you could back to her and say, “I thought about what you said about my face when I arrive in the morning, and I’m not sure how to act on that. My face is just my face — I’m not glaring at people or giving dirty looks — but I’ll make more of a point of saying good morning to people and hopefully that will solve it. Is your sense that there’s something else specific I should be doing?” That last part isn’t there to imply you’re willing to have a face transplant, but to hopefully make her realize that so far what she’s said hasn’t been actionable at all.

2. What’s a reasonable amount of info to expect from a college student seeking an internship?

I’m the point person for internships for my healthcare-adjacent organization. The vast majority of those are masters-level graduate students, and those internship requirements are pretty heavily regulated by the schools and by state law. When someone writes to me asking if we have any opening for graduate-level internships, I know pretty immediately what would be required in terms of the type of work the intern would be doing and the amount and type of oversight that would be required.

I occasionally get emails from undergrads asking about internships. We do not have any sort of formal undergrad internship programs. I would like to encourage people to get into this field (especially since we’re facing a national shortage). However, any interns would not be working with me directly, and so I have to sell the internship, basically, to any of my peers who might be willing to oversee an intern. I can help with some of the supervision, but most of it would fall on other managers.

None of the students who write in on their own can give me any details or direction about what they need or want from an internship. When I ask, I get a lot of “Anything would be fine,” or “Anything in your field.” We are extremely understaffed, I have a hard time getting any managers to agree to even the very structured internships because of the amount of time the supervision and training would entail. I’m frustrated by the undergrad inquiries and I find myself thinking, “If you can’t even give me the number of hours you want to or need to complete, the timeline you desire, and some sense of what you want to accomplish, and any restrictions or requirements from your school, you are likely going to require way more hand-holding than we can do.”

Am I holding undergrads to an unrealistic standard? If they could provide me with more details, I’d at least be willing to try to see if I could find them something. I’m not sure how much hand-holding or back and forth I should be doing, and if my assumption that my needing to do that is a red flag or if it’s just what I should be expecting from undergrads.

I don’t think it’s a red flag; by definition the undergrad students have less experience in the work world (and are probably getting less guidance from their programs) than the graduate students who approach you.

In your first contact, try spelling out very clearly what you need from them. For example: “We don’t have a formal internship program for undergrads, but we’re open to creating internships under the right circumstances. Please respond with the following information: the number of hours you would like to complete (this can be a range), the starting and ending dates you’re seeking, any requirements from your school, and an idea of specifically what you would be seeking to accomplish during the internship. Please note: we need all of this information in order to move forward, and cannot consider applications without it.”

If you spell it out that clearly and they don’t come back with the answers you asked for, don’t put more energy into it. But try spelling it out first.

3. How long should I wait for a new manager to turn things around?

I have been working in the IT department of a company for a little over 1.5 years. We have always struggled with understaffing, but it feels it has gotten worse over the last few months. My new manager started a few months after I did and we have worked together to make some great projects happen, but the workload of the department has skyrocketed without staffing keeping pace. I have been pointing this out for over a year. Unfortunately, things move slowly and while he has been fighting to get more staff approved, it has not happened fast enough, never mind that even if/when it’s approved, it takes forever to fill the slot and train someone.

I am approaching burnout quickly. I like my projects, I like my team for the most part and I like the money and the freedoms I have, so I would hate to quit. What is a reasonable amount of time to wait for new management to implement changes before throwing in the towel?

Over a year is a long time to wait, particularly when you say you’re quickly approaching burn-out and there are no real signs of impending change. Why not start looking now? Since you otherwise like your job, you can be picky and don’t need to jump at the first thing that comes along, but getting options in the mix will give you a lot more control in the situation.

4. I was asked to sign an NDA before talking about a job

I recently was reached out to by a CEO of a company that I had previously done some consulting for. It had been over a year since I had talked to them and they wanted to set up a meeting to reconnect. Since we last talked, I began working full-time again and no longer consult. I was open to connecting and could at least forward their questions to other industry contacts.

When we connected, they mentioned they liked working with me and wanted to talk about a vague high-level position and the networking call turned into an unplanned hour-long group interview without any chance for preparation on my side. The company provided no details about the level of the position or what it would require.

Before the company provides a job title or description, they need me to sign a NDA. Since they reached out to me to recruit me and are not providing even the basic details, this is a big red flag to me. What is your wisdom on this?

I don’t think it’s a particular red flag. If you’re open to hearing them out and don’t object to the terms of the NDA, sign it and see what they have to say. It doesn’t obligate you to continue beyond that. If you’re not that interested, let them know you’re not currently looking for work and leave it there! The fact that they reached out to you rather than the other way around isn’t really a factor in navigating it (and doesn’t make their request appreciably weirder).

5. What’s the deal with recruiters?

I see people talk about “recruiters” all the time, but I don’t really have an understanding of what that is. What industries use recruiters, and at what levels? Are they qualified to do things like mapping one’s skills and experience onto jobs, or is that more of a job coach thing? When someone has a resume of things but is open to switching sectors/industries, do they call a recruiter for help?

I have this image of someone in tech getting headhunted, but it seems like “recruiter” can mean a wide variety of things.

Lots of different industries use recruiters; in fact, I’m not sure there’s an industry that never uses them, particularly at more senior levels, although they’re definitely more common in some (like tech) than others.

The big thing to know is that recruiters work for employers, not job seekers. Employers hire them to fill jobs, and then they seek out candidates for those specific positions. They mostly don’t do things like helping you figure out what your skills and experience might qualify you for (unless they look at your resume and realize you’d be a great fit for something they happen to be hiring for). That’s more of a job coach thing.

The post people don’t like my face in the morning, waiting for a new boss to turn things around, and more appeared first on Ask a Manager.

mific: (Deadloch)
mific ([personal profile] mific) wrote in [community profile] fancake2025-06-30 09:48 am

Deadloch: Keep On Gruckin' by kirazi

Fandom: Deadloch
Characters/Pairings: Dulcie Collins/Eddie Redcliffe/Cath York
Rating: Explicit
Length: 5010
Content Notes: not kidding about the rating
Creator Links: kirazi on AO3
Themes: Female relationships, Femslash, Polyamory, Friends to lovers

Summary: “This is not a good idea, love,” Dulcie says, keeping her tone level. “I know I said I’d try to be more open to change, and I hear and respect your opinion, I truly do, but this is — it’s like the hobby farm. It’s really not going to work.”

“I just think,” Cath says, bright-eyed and earnest, “that it would be a healing experience for me. For us both! To share that kind of intimacy. I am committed to working through my anxiety about you fucking your partner and I’m sure that would be so much more manageable for me if we fucked her first. Together.”

(Eddie needs a gruck. Dulcie and Cath offer to help her out.)

Reccer's Notes: This is a polyamory fic where Cath decides she and Dulcie should have sex with Eddie so as to manage her anxiety that Dulcie might be unfaithful with Eddie (as happened in the past with a former partner at work). There's some nice psychological and historical exploration as Dulcie tries to work out what's going on, and the eventual sex is hot and well-written. What I like most is the character voices and dialogue for the three of them, which are spot on. It's also very funny, as are Eddie's creative takes on the English language.

Fanwork Links: Keep On Gruckin'
rydra_wong: Lee Miller photo showing two women wearing metal fire masks in England during WWII. (Default)
rydra_wong ([personal profile] rydra_wong) wrote2025-06-29 01:54 pm
Entry tags:

PSA

Disco Elysium is currently 90% off in the Steam summer sale, making it a mere £3.49.

Play Disco Elysium, everybody. Yes, even if you don't play video games.

(It was the first video game I ever played -- apart from having once(?) played Pac Man as a child, many many decades ago -- and it was a perfect choice.)

If you understand the principle of a Choose Your Own Adventure book, have a vague sense that "stats" and "levelling up" are things, and can grasp "click to go to a place/interact with an object," you are sufficiently equipped.

ETA: Okay, I will add in [personal profile] astrogirl's excellent content warning:

It's definitely not for everybody. I mean, for one thing, it gets pretty much all the trigger warnings for everything. Alcoholism and substance abuse, suicidal thoughts, discussions of sexual assault, gore (not visual, but some of the descriptions are very vivid), you name it. A number of characters are giant racists. (Towards fictional races/ethnicities, mind you, but it's still ugly.) Evil children will hurl homophobic slurs at you. That sort of thing. And whatever your politics, the game will try very hard to make you feel uncomfortable about them.
ysabetwordsmith: Cartoon of me in Wordsmith persona (Default)
ysabetwordsmith ([personal profile] ysabetwordsmith) wrote in [site community profile] dw_community_promo2025-06-29 04:16 am

Allbingo and Crowdfunding

[community profile] allbingo provides a space for creative people to share their work, using bingo cards for inspiration.

[community profile] crowdfunding is a community for creators, patrons, and fans of cyberfunded creativity.

Further details below ...

Read more... )
SGA Storyfinders ([syndicated profile] sga_storyfinders_feed) wrote2025-06-29 03:08 am

'Catch Me As I Fall' by codemonkey????

Posted by pfyre

I’ve been on the search for ‘Catch Me As I Fall’ by codemonkey – when I checked with the Wayback Machine it comes up but the actual story does not load…
Catch Me As I Fall by codemonkey [NC-17]
<https://web.archive.org/web/20111015152722/http://wraithbait.com/viewstory.php?sid=16009&warning=12>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20111015152722/http://wraithbait.com/viewuser.php?uid=3308>

The rest of the info below:
Summary: A crossover with the Dragonriders of Pernbook by Anne McCaffrey. Rodney's whole life was changed when he became the rider of dragon Laurenth. Now he has to find his place in Benden Weyr and figure out his feelings for handsome dragonrider J'hon
Categories: Crossovers > Slash Pairings, Slash Pairings > McKay/Sheppard
Characters: John Sheppard, Radek Zelenka, Rodney McKay, Ronon Dex, Teyla Emmagan
Genres: Angst, First Time, Romance
Warnings: Adult themes
Chapters: 2 [Table of Contents]
Series: None
Word count: 7298; Completed: Yes
Updated: 27 Mar 2011; Published: 26 Mar 2011

Does anyone know where I can find the story or perhaps have a copy available? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance for any help.

Organization for Transformative Works ([syndicated profile] otw_news_feed) wrote2025-06-28 05:27 pm

TOS Spotlight: Commercial Promotion

Posted by xeno

The Policy & Abuse committee (PAC) is responsible for enforcing the AO3 Terms of Service (TOS). To help users better understand the TOS, we’re posting a weekly spotlight series about the TOS and our policies. We’ll also be reading comments and answering questions on this and our other spotlight posts.


For our last post in this series, we’ll be talking about our non-commercialization policy. AO3 doesn’t allow users to engage in commercial promotion of any type, which includes everything from paywalls to tip jars, and quite a lot in between. In this post, we’ll discuss why AO3 doesn’t allow commercialization, what kinds of activities are considered to be commercial promotion, and what to do if you see commercial promotion on AO3.

Don’t go looking for things to report.

Please do not start searching for works to report after reading this post. We know that commercial promotion frequently appears on AO3. However, when people deliberately search for works to report, we end up getting a lot of duplicate tickets about works that have already been reported. Every ticket we receive is reviewed by a PAC volunteer, so we only need one report in order to investigate an issue. We know it seems like sites only respond to mass reports, but on AO3, duplicate and mass reports increase the time it takes our volunteers to investigate.

What is commercial promotion?

Commercial promotion covers all references or links to commercial sites, monetized features of non-commercial sites, and anything else that makes it clear someone is asking for or has received financial contributions.

On AO3, you can’t encourage anyone to give other people money, or talk about anyone having given people money in the past. This applies whether you are promoting yourself or a friend, or even if you’re collecting donations for other people or causes. If there is money changing hands, then it likely violates AO3’s TOS.

AO3 is a non-commercial space.

AO3 was created and is managed by the Organization for Transformative Works (OTW), a nonprofit organization committed to the defense and protection of fanworks from commercial exploitation and legal challenges. The OTW is entirely staffed by unpaid volunteers, and AO3 is itself entirely non-commercial. No one involved in AO3’s creation or management profits from it. The site is made available free of charge to all fans who wish to share their works with other fans and fan communities.

We understand that many people today choose to monetize their creative activities. However, in order to keep AO3 as the non-commercial space it was designed to be, users are not permitted to engage in any commercial activity on the site.

When you use AO3, you agree to follow our Terms of Service, which includes the non-commercialization policy. This applies to all parts of the site, whether you’re posting a work based on an existing source or creating content entirely original to you.

AO3’s non-commercialization policy applies to the entire site.

Real-world commercialization is banned everywhere on AO3. This includes:

  • Profile pages
  • Usernames, pseuds, and pseud descriptions
  • Works (including all tags, beginning or end notes, chapter notes, summaries, and titles)
  • Series (including titles, summaries, descriptions, and notes)
  • Bookmarks (including tags and notes)
  • Comments
  • Prompt memes, gift exchanges, and other collections
  • Any other part of AO3

It’s okay for fictional characters in fanworks to talk about fictional monetization. For example, it’s fine if a character has a fictional OnlyFans or Patreon within the story, as long as that commercial reference doesn’t direct the reader to a real-world OnlyFans or Patreon account for the work creator or anyone else.

What are some examples of commercial activities?

There is a wide variety of things that are not allowed under AO3’s non-commercialization rules.

Links or references to any commercial site or service. A “commercial site” is any site whose primary purpose is to facilitate the transfer of money. This includes, but is not limited to:

  • Storefronts like Amazon or Etsy
  • Crowd fundraisers like Kickstarter or GoFundMe​​
  • Tip jars or membership subscriptions like Ko-Fi or Patreon
  • ​​Payment platforms like PayPal or Venmo

Links or references to the monetized features of non-commercial sites. This covers any site that has features you can enable or opt-in to earn revenue, but the primary purpose of the site is social media, sharing artwork, or anything else that isn’t inherently payment-focused. This includes, but is not limited to:

  • Paywalls or early-access content like Wattpad Paid Stories or Webtoon Canvas
  • Storefronts like DeviantArt Shop or Instagram Shop
  • Tip jars or membership subscriptions like TikTok Donation Stickers or Twitch Prime

Previews and other promotions for paid content. This covers situations like excerpts or teasers shared in an attempt to entice people to purchase a book or become a paying subscriber. It also includes references to paywalled or early-access content (e.g. “Patreon subscribers get the new chapter one week early before I post it on AO3”).

Advertising content or services involving an exchange of money, such as buying merchandise, collecting donations, offering paid commissions, or selling published works.

Any other language which one might interpret as requesting or having requested financial contributions, whether for yourself or others. This covers indirect references, euphemisms, or other language intended to get around the TOS. Some examples of this include:

  • Thanks for the coffee!
  • My ☕ username is the same as my username here
  • This chapter is brought to you by my patrons
  • You know where to find me if you want early or bonus chapters
  • Check out my Twitter to learn how you can donate to me since I’m not allowed to discuss it here
  • If you want to hear more about my ideas, talk about fandom, or find more of my stuff for a coin, visit my Tumblr

Solicitation is not allowed, whether it’s for yourself or on behalf of someone else.

Commercial activity is not permitted on AO3. It doesn’t matter if you’re promoting yourself or a friend, or even if you’re collecting donations for other people or causes.

This means that if you paid an artist to create artwork for your fanfic, you’re not allowed to mention that they have a Patreon or use any other language that suggests people should also commission or donate to them. If you like a book by a particular author, you are certainly welcome to gush about what a great book it is, but you can’t link to the Amazon page where it’s for sale or encourage others to buy it.

What is the difference between a commercial site and a non-commercial site that has monetization features?

As mentioned above, a commercial site is a platform that is first and foremost intended to facilitate the exchange of money. For example, while you can use Ko-Fi as a blog, the site’s primary purpose is to encourage people to give each other money. Ko-Fi’s social features are secondary to its purpose as a donation and paid membership platform. This means you cannot link to or mention your or anyone else’s actual Ko-Fi on AO3 whatsoever.

An example of a non-commercial site that has monetization features is DeviantArt, an art gallery that is mainly intended as a place to share artworks. DeviantArt also allows its users to opt-in to additional monetization features, such as the DeviantArt Shop. Because DeviantArt’s paid features are both optional and not the primary reason people use the site, you can talk about or link to DeviantArt on AO3 – as long as you aren’t directing anyone to a paywalled post or referencing DeviantArt’s paid features in any way.

Can I link or mention a social media site where I talk about making money or collecting donations?

You’re allowed to link or mention social media like Tumblr or personal websites like WordPress, even if you sometimes post about commercial activities on those sites. However, you cannot reference commercial promotion on AO3 itself, nor may you link, mention, or give instructions for finding an account, page, or post that is solely promoting paid content.

Statements such as “Follow me on social media” or “Check out my Linktree” are fine. Directing people to an Amazon author page or to the Ko-fi link in your Twitter bio would not be allowed. This includes things like “Check out my Linktree to learn how you can support me” in cases where you are clearly referring to monetary support.

Can I post a fanwork created for a charity drive or for-profit zine?

While you cannot promote, solicit, or otherwise ask for donations on AO3, you are allowed to add your work to a collection or otherwise briefly mention why you created a fanwork, as long as you do so in a non-commercial manner. This means you can say “This was created for [Event]” or “Originally Written for [Name of Person/Zine]” as long as you do not directly link to a donation page or ask others to donate to them.

Keep in mind we also do not permit mentions of monetary transactions, regardless of when they occurred. A note such as “This was a $100 bid for Fandom Trumps Hate” would still be considered commercialization.

I’ve seen authors say their works are commissions. Is this allowed?

You are allowed to gift your work to someone else or otherwise briefly mention why you created a fanwork, as long as you do so in a non-commercial manner. Because not all commissioned fanworks were created for pay, we do permit usage of the word “commission” as long as there is no indication that a monetary transaction was involved in the creation of the work or that you are available to create other paid commissions.

For example, phrasing like “This is a commission for X” is acceptable, but “Commission for my Gold Tier Patron, Julie” or “My client agreed to let me post the first chapter of their commission” isn’t. The context makes it clear that both “patron” and “client” are references to a paying sponsor.

I’ve seen others ask for donations or advertise paid commissions. Why can’t I?

As our TOS FAQ explains, we don’t review content until it’s reported to us. You may have seen somebody else mentioning their paywalled content or otherwise engaging in commercial activities on AO3, but that doesn’t mean that it’s allowed. All it means is that nobody has reported that content to us yet, or that we haven’t finished processing the report.

What will happen if I get reported for commercial promotion?

First, we’ll review the reported work to confirm that you violated our TOS by engaging in commercial activities on AO3. If we determine that you did, we’ll send you an email telling you to remove the violating material.

If your work can be edited to fix the issue, you’ll be asked to edit the work. Your work may be hidden from other users until you do. If you choose not to edit the work, or if your work cannot be edited into compliance with the TOS, it will be deleted.

PAC will only ever contact you by email, and only after we’ve determined that your work violates our Terms of Service. We will never comment on your work or contact you through social media. Please make sure to keep your account’s email address up to date and check it regularly (including your spam folder), or else you may miss our warning email.

If you repeatedly post works that violate our commercial promotion policies, you may be temporarily suspended. Continuing to violate the TOS will result in your being permanently banned from AO3. You can learn more about warnings and suspensions in our TOS FAQ.

What should I do if I encounter commercial activity on AO3?

You can give the creator a heads up by politely commenting on their work and linking to the TOS FAQ or this post. Alternatively, you can report the work to us.

What about spam comments?

The best way to deal with spam comments, commercial or otherwise, depends on whether the comments are from registered accounts or guests.

How do I report commercial activity?

Although we ask that you do not deliberately seek out commercial promotion to report, if you come across commercial activity while browsing, you can report it using the Policy Questions & Abuse Reports form, which is linked at the bottom of every page on AO3.

Please don’t report more than one user at a time or submit multiple reports about the same user. When reporting multiple works by the same user, please submit only one report with links to each work you’re reporting, so that all information about that user is in the same place.

Please tell us exactly where in the work the commercialization is. The best way to do this is to give us a description or short quote that we can search for in order to immediately find the content. If you are reporting multiple works by the same creator, please group all the works into one report and provide this information for each work.

For example, a report of commercial promotion might look like this:

Link to the page you are reporting: https://archiveofourown.org/works/00000000

Brief summary of Terms of Service violation: Commercial promotion

Description of the content you are reporting:
This work by USERNAME advertises a ko-fi in the end notes of chapter 3.

If you are reporting additional works, please include all relevant links and other information in your report description:

Description of the content you are reporting:
This work by USERNAME advertises a ko-fi in the end notes of chapter 3.

Some of their other works also contain commercial promotion:

https://archiveofourown.org/works/23456789 encourages readers to purchase their book on Amazon: “If you’re curious what else I’ve been working on or want to support me elsewhere, check out my new short story on Kindle Unlimited!”

https://archiveofourown.org/works/34567890 contains an embedded image with a Patreon watermark. Underneath, the sentence “If you want more like this, click here” takes you to their commissions price sheet.

You can add more details if you like, but this example provides the basic information we need:

  • Who posted the commercial promotion: Tell us their username or if the work is anonymous or orphaned.
  • Where we can find the work(s): Enter one URL in the “Link to the page you are reporting” field, and (if applicable) include links to any other violating works in the description of your report.
  • What violates the TOS: Explain why you think commercial promotion has occurred, for example by including a quote and/or providing context for a comment exchange. A brief description of the situation is fine; you don’t need to be very detailed or quote an entire TOS or FAQ section.

You’ll receive an automatic email confirming that we received your report, and our volunteers will investigate when they get a chance. Please be patient and do not submit another report about the same work. While PAC investigates every report we receive, it can take several months for us to process a report, and not every report will receive a reply.

What if I have more questions about commercial promotion?

PAC follows a strict confidentiality policy. Therefore, while you are welcome to ask general questions in the comments of this post, we will not give information on specific cases, publicly rule on a work, or update you on the status of a report you have already submitted. Comments on this post that discuss specific works or users will be removed.

If you think you’ve found commercial promotion on AO3, or if you want to know whether a particular work contains commercial promotion, please report the work to us as described above. For more information, you can read our TOS FAQ on Commercial Promotion.

If you are still uncertain, you can comment below or submit a question through the Policy Questions & Abuse Reports form.

puddleshark: (Default)
puddleshark ([personal profile] puddleshark) wrote in [community profile] common_nature2025-06-28 01:32 pm

Sea Fog

Rooks in the Fog, St Aldhelm's Head 1

I have been playing hide-and-seek with the rooks in the sea fog up on St Alhelm's Head.

Not a glimpse of the sea )
reeby10: an old school error pop up that says 'canon error' at the top and 'apply fanfic? ok' (fanfic)
Reeby ([personal profile] reeby10) wrote in [community profile] fancake2025-06-27 10:27 pm

Midsommar: a queen for all seasons by Selkit

Fandom: Midsommar
Characters: Dani Ardor, Hanna, Siv
Rating: T
Length: 4,212
Creator Links: [archiveofourown.org profile] Selkit
Theme: female relationships

Summary: In her dreams, dark smudges crowd the edges of the world. One looms larger than the rest, twisting into impossible shapes, morphing into a figure with many faces, all of them howling with rage.

When she jolts awake, the dream-figure lingers. She tries to ignore it. She’s no stranger to nightmares. Her whole life has been one ever since her family’s deaths.

But things are different now. This is a new life. A new family.

Right?

Reccer's Notes: I love seeing what happens with Dani after the events of Midsommar, and this is such a good look at the continued ritual of being the May Queen! I am a known ho for ritual, but especially building off of the existing worldbuilding in such a believable way. I really enjoyed seeing more of Dani interacting with the other women of the Hårga as she learns to be part of her new family and culture. Plus the parts with Maja’s (and Christian’s) daughter were just perfect.

Fanwork Links: on AO3
mific: (Art brushes pencils)
mific ([personal profile] mific) wrote in [community profile] fancake2025-06-28 02:06 pm

Original Work: Always with you by Anonymous

Fandom: original work
Characters/Pairings: powerful mage/warrior bonded to her
Rating: G
Length: n/a
Creator Links: creators have been revealed but the artist chose to make the work anon.
Themes: Female relationships, Femslash, Female characters, Characters of color, Magic

Summary: none provided

Reccer's Notes: Another gorgeous work from the recent Everything is Femslash exchange. It's in a fantasy setting, featuring a mage and her warrior. I love the warm earthy colours, and how, the mage being a little shorter, their faces and bodies fit together perfectly, and the way they're linked by the swirl of the magical bond. Beautiful. (Note that the post is locked to AO3.)

Fanwork Links: Always with you

Ask a Manager ([syndicated profile] askamanager_feed) wrote2025-06-27 11:07 pm

weekend open thread – June 28-29, 2025

Posted by Ask a Manager

Eve

This comment section is open for any non-work-related discussion you’d like to have with other readers, by popular demand.

Here are the rules for the weekend posts.

Book recommendation of the week: Girls Girls Girls, by Shoshana von Blanckensee. As soon as they graduate high school, two best friends (and secret girlfriends) drive to San Francisco and try to make a life there. It’s about being gay, Jewish, and loving your grandma. It’s also about strip clubs, cringing at yourself, and figuring out who you are versus who your family is. I loved it. (Amazon, Bookshop)

* I earn a commission if you use those links.

The post weekend open thread – June 28-29, 2025 appeared first on Ask a Manager.

slacktivist ([syndicated profile] slacktivist_feed) wrote2025-06-27 08:18 pm
reeby10: Zachary Quinto and Christ Pine standing next to each other with "xoxox" at the bottom (pinto)
Reeby ([personal profile] reeby10) wrote in [site community profile] dw_community_promo2025-06-27 03:14 pm
Entry tags:

celebrity20in20 Round 15



Link: Round 15 Sign Ups | Round 15 Themes

Description: [community profile] celebrity20in20 is a 20in20 community dedicated to making icons of actors and actresses. You have 20 days to make 20 icons about a celebrity of your choice, based on a set of themes for the round.

Schedule: Round 15 sign ups are open NOW. Icons are due July 17, 2025.
starwatcher: Western windmill, clouds in background, trees around base. (Default)
StarWatcher ([personal profile] starwatcher) wrote in [community profile] ebooks2025-06-27 10:45 am
Entry tags:

Ebook sale, today only, Friday 27th

 

This one has multiple genres.

Books for sale, mostly $1 to $3

Hit the "Genres" button at the top of the page to narrow your search.

Happy reading!

ETA: Jesse_the_k notes that "This is a meta-search engine, compiling deals from Amazon, Apple, Barnes & Noble, Google and Kobo." I didn't realize that was note-worthy, but yeah. Whatever platform you use to read, you're covered.

 
Ask a Manager ([syndicated profile] askamanager_feed) wrote2025-06-27 03:00 pm

open thread – June 27, 2025

Posted by Ask a Manager

It’s the Friday open thread!

The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on any work-related questions that you want to talk about (that includes school). If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet*, but this is a chance to take your questions to other readers.

* If you submitted a question to me recently, please do not repost it here, as it may be in my queue to answer.

The post open thread – June 27, 2025 appeared first on Ask a Manager.

sinesofinsanity: For squeeing (Batman Squee)
sinesofinsanity ([personal profile] sinesofinsanity) wrote in [community profile] fancake2025-06-27 09:06 am

DCU: Office Meeting by Unpretty

Fandom: DC Comics
Pairings/Characters: Pamela Isely/Harleen Quinzel, Bruce Wayne
Rating: Teen 
Length: 1,882 words
Creator Links: Unpretty on AO3
Theme: Female relationships, Canon lgbtq+ characters, humour, superpowers

Summary:
Bruce Wayne deals with supervillains almost as much as Batman does.

Reccer's Notes:
Harley Quinn and Poison Ivy break into Bruce Wayne's office to stop Wayne Enterprises from doing evil corporate stuff. Or kill him. Bruce plays dumb. It's glorious. 
I love Harley and Ivy's relationship in this. They're so true in how they love and support each other but are definitely super-villains who will definitely kill and/or main whoever gets in their way. Also Bruce's line about how Pamela probably wants to kill him because Harley finds him hot :D Bruce being smart by playing dumb is one of my favourite things. 

Fanwork Links: Office Meeting
Also has a podfic
 

Organization for Transformative Works ([syndicated profile] otw_news_feed) wrote2025-06-27 02:23 pm

AO3 Releases 0.9.409 – 0.9.413: Change Log

Posted by choux

In May and June, we made some security additions for user accounts by adding email notifications when an account’s username or password is changed. We also made some improvements around tag sets and challenge signups. As one more security change, we also permanently disabled image embedding in guest comments.

A special thank you to our new contributors Ashley Tan, dismayonnaise, Grayson von Goetz, Jen Mann, kitbur, and ryelle!

Credits

  • Coders: Ashley Tan, Bilka, Brian Austin, Ceithir, Connie Feng, dismayonnaise, EchoEkhi, Grayson von Goetz, Hamham6, Jen Mann, kitbur, marcus8448, ryelle, Sarken, Scott, slavalamp, weeklies
  • Code reviewers: Bilka, Brian Austin, Ceithir, james_, lydia-theda, redsummernight, slavalamp, Sarken, weeklies
  • Testers: Bilka, Brian Austin, choux, Deniz, Eskici, LilyP, Lute, lydia-theda, Maine, megidola, Runt, Sam Johnsson, Sarken, Scott, Tal, Teyris, therealmorticia, wichard

Details

0.9.409

On May 11, we deployed some improvements to tag sets and added an email notification whenever the username on your account is changed.

  • [AO3-5513] – Admins can now successfully create and rename media tags without running into 500 errors or caching issues.
  • [AO3-5714] – When a canonical fandom and a non-canonical character or relationship were added to the same tag set, the non-canonical tags were automatically listed under the fandom. However, this is just how the tags were displayed in the tag set. They weren’t really connected to the fandom, which meant they weren’t included in autocompletes and couldn’t be used in challenge sign-ups. We’ve stopped automatically listing the non-canonical tags under the fandom and will instead only do it if the tag set moderators set up an association (which will also make the non-canonical tags usable in sign-ups and help ensure they appear in the autocomplete).
  • [AO3-5919] – We updated the code for kudos emails to avoid using a method that wasn’t particularly efficient.
  • [AO3-6757] – When an admin hides a comment, any embedded images in the hidden comment will now be replaced with the image URLs.
  • [AO3-6844] – We fixed a whole bunch of display and page structure issues on pages that list the tags in a tag set.
  • [AO3-6977] – We’ve started spam checking edits to comments from new users and stopped spam checking any comments a work creator leaves on their own work.
  • [AO3-6981] – To improve account security, we now send you an email when you (or someone logged in to your account) change your username.
  • [AO3-6984] – Our dependency updater bumped our version of net-imap to 0.5.7. It’s not something we use, but keeping dependencies up to date is good.
  • [AO3-6988] – We started caching the package installs involved in our automated tests, making each test run faster.
  • [AO3-6990] – We bumped our version of the rack gem to 2.2.14 to get the latest security fix.

0.9.410

On May 16, we added an email notification whenever the password of your account is changed. We also made a number of small improvements all around the site.

  • [AO3-5712] – Under certain circumstances, it was possible to sign up for a challenge using a character or relationship that wasn’t permitted by the challenge’s tag set. Now you’ll get an error if you try to do that.
  • [AO3-6267] – If a draft chapter was added to a work in your History, your History would lie to you and say an update to the work was available. Now it will only tell you an update is available if a new chapter has been published since you last accessed the work.
  • [AO3-6627] – Whenever a site admin tried to update the roles for a user who already had roles outside the admin’s purview, those existing roles would be removed. (For example, when a Tag Wrangling admin gave the tag wrangler role to a user who had the Open Doors archivist role, the user would lose their archivist role.) We’ve fixed it so any existing roles will stay in place.
  • [AO3-6994] – We fixed an issue that was causing our spam checker to run on comments from accounts with recently changed email addresses.
  • [AO3-6005] – We used feature tests somewhere we should’ve been using unit tests, so we changed them over.
  • [AO3-6975] – At some point the admin setting for how long to keep around unactivated accounts had become disconnected from the code it was meant to control. We fixed this so the setting once again affects the right piece of code.
  • [AO3-6970] – When the Policy & Abuse committee hides a work, you get an automatic email to notify you. To prepare for some future changes, we’ve updated the email text to allow for multiple works in the same email.
  • [AO3-6973] – Another account security enhancement: you’ll now get an email when you (or someone accessing your account) change or reset your password.

0.9.411

On May 24, we deployed an improvement to word counts for multichapter works on the Statistics page. We also took steps to fight abuse in guest comments by preventing them from ever displaying embedded images.

  • [AO3-3818] – On some specific browsers on certain devices, leaving comments or submitting support tickets would result in an error. We’ve now fixed that.
  • [AO3-4190] – Every time invitations were sent, the log on the site settings page updated to say the settings had been modified. We’ve fixed it so it will only say the settings have been updated when an admin updates them.
  • [AO3-7000] – One of the external links in the Creating a Skin help pop-up pointed to a site that had been taken over by a crypto magazine, so we’ve replaced it with a new resource for learning about CSS.
  • [AO3-6995] – In a previous release, we tried to drop an unused database column. Unfortunately, we had to put it back when it turned out Rails was still looking for the column due to caching. We’ve now made a code change that will let us drop the column for real after a future release.
  • [AO3-5270] – The yearly word counts on your Statistics page will now only count words written in chapters posted in that year. That means if you add a chapter to a WIP you started last year, the words you wrote last year will still count toward 2024’s total instead of being added to 2025’s total.
  • [AO3-5347] – The notification you get when someone cites your work as a related work has now been prepared for translation.
  • [AO3-6092] – A while ago, we unintentionally fixed a bug where the chapter title didn’t display in Entire Work mode if the work only had one posted chapter. Now we’ve added an automated test to make sure we don’t unintentionally break it again.
  • [AO3-6684] – The close button on the banner we use for sitewide announcements uses an ×, which typically makes sense if you’re looking at the page, but which gets read as “multiplication sign” if you’re using a screen reader. That was confusing, so we’ve made sure screen readers will now say “hide banner” instead.
  • [AO3-6967] – We’ve added a second save button to the top of tag edit pages to make things a little more convenient when the page is long and a wrangler is just changing something at the top of the form.
  • [AO3-6987] – Under certain circumstances, we strip embedded images from certain fields. We used to just show the image URL when we did that, but now we show all of the HTML.
  • [AO3-6991] – As a safety measure, guest comments with embedded images will always show the HTML instead of embedded images. (This includes existing guest comments.)

0.9.412

On June 5, we deployed a small release with some bug fixes.

  • [AO3-6166] – If you knew the ID of an unrevealed work you could access a few subpages of the work, such as the collections page, and find out the title of the work that way. Since that’s meant to be unrevealed, we’ve changed these pages so you can no longer access them if the work is unrevealed.
  • [AO3-6937] – We changed the browser page title on inbox pages to a format that matches other user pages: “username – Inbox | Archive of Our Own.”
  • [AO3-6953] – We made sure you’ll get an error message if you attempt to clear your History and it fails.
  • [AO3-6993] – The Edit Multiple Works page will no longer display a bunch of unusable options when you don’t have any works. Instead, it will simply tell you you don’t have any works.
  • [AO3-6550] – When displaying work titles, we used to call a function on them that had already been called. We’ve stopped doing that since it’s redundant.
  • [AO3-6948] – We added some code to enable us to monitor the performance of the job that sends invitations to people in the invitation queue.

0.9.413

Our June 16 deploy added the ability to embed media from audio.com in works.

  • [AO3-6515] – We fixed an error 500 that occured when a work with end notes was marked as published, but only had draft chapters.
  • [AO3-6912] – We changed the browser page title for unrevealed works to include the site name at the end.
  • [AO3-6437] – We removed some unused database tables.
  • [AO3-6996] – We finally dropped that unused database column and removed the code we added to make that go smoothly.
  • [AO3-6235] – Admins from the Policy & Abuse committee can now turn invitation requests on and off from the site settings page.
  • [AO3-6588] – Admins from the Open Doors and Support committees can now give users the role that disables password reset emails for their account.
  • [AO3-7003] – You can now add embeds from audio.com to your works.
Ask a Manager ([syndicated profile] askamanager_feed) wrote2025-06-27 04:03 am

I was hired to replace someone who won’t retire, is it unethical to give negative answers after agre

Posted by Ask a Manager

It’s four answers to four questions. Here we go…

1. I was hired to replace someone who won’t retire

In January, I started a job as the financial controller for a small organization. I was excited for the responsibility because I would be taking over for the retiring controller.

It’s nearly July, I’m doing all the work, but he still has not retired. I’ve gotten all good feedback, but we disagree often, so it’s becoming harder to be patient and keep doing things his way, not mine. He now plans to retire but then stay on for several months in a “limited capacity,” maintaining account access and authorities. The president knows of some of my frustration and our differing approaches, but the he doesn’t like to contradict the controller.

I’m the third person they have had in this role in less than two years (he’s been trying to retire for a while), and they (of course) wanted someone for the long term. But ultimately the job is too easy, there is little to no opportunity to grow my skills, and I’m not aligned with many of the president’s decisions, including his handling of this transition. I plan to lay low until I find something else. Any advice?

Yeah, assume that guy isn’t retiring any time soon. I’d say that even without the history of the two hires before you — but you’re the third person who’s been hired to replace him and he didn’t manage to leave for any of them. For whatever reason, he’s not going anywhere and the company isn’t pushing to fulfill their promises to you.

I suppose if you want to give it one clear shot, you could talk to the president and lay out your concerns — “I’m the third person who’s been brought in to replace him, it’s been six months and he’s not making any moves to leave, and I’m not able to do the job I was hired for. This is not sustainable, and I need a clear timeline on fully transitioning me into the role I came on to do.” But I’d be pretty skeptical until/unless you see it happen.

Related:
I was hired to run a department — but the old boss is still there, 10 months later

2. Responding when someone needs to cancel a meeting because of war

I work in a large public institution that employs many international professionals, a large percentage of whom are from an area that’s currently at war. So far this year I’ve had to cancel multiple meetings because my colleagues’ families were being bombed in their home countries, and with everything going on I know this is not likely to stop. How on earth does one write an email that is appropriate for work and reflects that we are not close, but conveys my sorrow that they are dealing with this? I do a fair amount of activism surrounding the injustice of the violence their families are enduring outside of work, and I know they are facing an incredible amount of discrimination on top of everything, partially from our organization. I’d really like them to know that my team supports them and wants to accommodate them as they prioritize and focus on their family’s safety, without sobbing into the void every time I get the email asking to cancel. This sucks.

Express empathy and say that you understand and hope their families are safe. For example, if someone explains they have to cancel a meeting because of what’s happening, you can reply: “Of course, please take all the time you need. We understand the situation and are here when you are ready, and I hope your family is safe.” Depending on the context, you could also ask if you can take any work off their plate.

3. Is it unethical to give negative answers after agreeing to be a reference?

Last month a college housemate of mine, Blake, reached out asking for our former landlord’s contact information to use in a job application that apparently required extensive past housing references. I gave him this information but pointed out that as I was the head tenant of this house — in charge of subletting out individual rooms — the landlord never knew anybody living there beyond myself. Blake asked to put my information down instead, which I agreed to.

The other day I received an email from the job Blake applied for, which turns out to be law enforcement-related and asked more detailed questions relating to Blake’s character than I expected for a housing reference to be asked. Many I could answer positively or at least neutrally, but a few gave me pause, such as, “Would you trust this candidate with the safety of yourself or others?” and “how does this candidate react in stressful situations?” and “do you think this candidate would be equipped to handle duties relating to protection of the public?”

During the time I lived with Blake, we had a problem housemate who I had to kick out of the house due to her combativeness and refusal to pay rent after moving in. The night after she was given notice, she ambushed me with several of her friends while I was home alone and had two of the men corner me in the living room and intimidate me into saying she could stay. During this confrontation, Blake arrived home, took a look at us in the living room, and retreated to his room without a word. He did not come out again until hours after I’d finally gotten the “attack dogs” to leave.

This incident is now almost eight years in the past, but I’m finding it hard to speak even neutrally about Blake’s character when it comes to these areas. I asked one friend what she would do, and her opinion is that since I agreed to be a reference, it would be unethical to undermine his chances of getting the job by responding negatively. I’ve also never been in the position to give someone a negative reference and don’t know if it’s considered unprofessional to bring long-past personal drama into my answers. What would be the right thing to do here?

Your friend is wrong. You agreed to be, essentially, a landlord reference, which normally means confirming the person paid on time and didn’t destroy the house. You had no idea you were being asked to be a character reference and to comment on the things you ended up being asked. Moreover, the stakes are extremely high for public safety jobs; under no circumstances should you shade the truth or speak more positively about a candidate for law enforcement than you actually feel. (For that matter, I’d argue the same is true for regular job references too; good references are nuanced, not just glowing across the board, and you could agree to give someone a generally positive reference and still end up being asked a question that you didn’t have a super positive answer to.)

Now, all that said, I’m not sure how significant the incident you recounted with Blake really is. When he came home, was it clear you were being intimidated and didn’t feel safe? Or could he have had no idea what was going on? If it’s the latter, I don’t think it’s really relevant to the reference. If it’s the former, it still might not be that relevant eight years later — but you’re being asked to share what you knew back when you lived with him, so in that case it would be appropriate to share that experience and let them sort out what it should mean.

4. What’s the point of setting goals for my job?

I feel like I’m completely out of touch with corporate reality. I have worked in IT and IT adjacent positions for over 20 years. My only real goal has been to do my job well enough that others are happy with my performance. I don’t want a promotion. I don’t particularly want more responsibility. But every year, I’m asked to come up with goals and asked to align them with whatever the latest corporate-speak is.

What am I missing here? My current job isn’t going to change much — I support an existing system, I get my project work done on time, I’m responsive to any tickets I receive, I help others if I can. I’m not in a position to move anything forward or get new clients or anything like that. So what should I write?

Your goals should be about what you’ll achieve over a defined period of time (in this case, it sounds like a year). What would successful performance look like during that period? If you imagine you’re at the end of the year and you’re looking back on how the year went, what metrics or outcomes would indicate to you and your manager that you did your job well? For some jobs, those goals will be more or less the same every year — which for work like yours might be things like “tickets are answered as completely and accurately as possible within X hours for urgent tickets and within X hours for high priority tickets,” “all staff feel comfortable using our software and systems to do their jobs effectively,” “no employee will ever lose more than X hours of productive work time due to technology difficulties,” etc. — i.e., descriptions of what doing your job well (as opposed to doing it at a middling or poor level) looks like.

The post I was hired to replace someone who won’t retire, is it unethical to give negative answers after agreeing to be a reference, and more appeared first on Ask a Manager.

Ask a Manager ([syndicated profile] askamanager_feed) wrote2025-06-26 05:59 pm

if I work in the office, everyone just wants to socialize

Posted by Ask a Manager

A reader writes:

My team is fully remote but welcome to come in whenever we please. People will come in for any number of reasons, such as if they have plans in the area later, need a bigger monitor to finish a project, or just want to change their scenery for a bit (almost always my reason). We have a Teams chat and when we work from home, we chat almost all day long. When we are in the office, we chat a lot, go to lunch together, and usually have a good time.

However, we still have a weekly hour-long video call on the calendar. This is supposed to be “optional” because it’s “just to chat” but everyone always attends. During these, there are always so many very long, very awkward lulls in conversation where everyone is clearly uncomfortable but no one will say anything about it or leave. The calls aren’t the worst thing in life, but they are irritating enough that I don’t want to attend them. Or at the very least, I’d like to have them moved to every other week. I asked around and none of the other teams operate this way; their meetings are bi-weekly for 25-30 minutes tops.

Also, when we are in the office, instead of going to lunch together some of the time, it is EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. The vibe is very much, “If you came to the office today, you must want to lunch with us. Why else are you here?” and then passive-aggressive comments if you decline and have nothing else to do.

It used to be that you’d be able to tell when someone wanted to hang out in the office for social contact because they would send a blast telling everyone what day they would be there and you could steer clear if you weren’t up for it. But they don’t do that anymore and now if I end up in the office on the same day as others, I’m expected to hang out with them even if I have nothing else to do, but still really don’t want to. Occasionally wouldn’t be a problem, but this is happening more and more. I’m planning on solving the issue by just working elsewhere when I want to get out of the house, even though my office is awesome with free snacks and little cozy nooks. (Which you can’t hide in anymore because team members will look on our scheduling sheet and see who else is in that day and go hunting around for you!)

How do I manage this? I’m friendly and personable and chat as much as I can take (and in most cases more than I can take) and I understand the need to have some team interaction, I really do, but I can’t go on like this. I’ve talked to the team lead but he is the worst offender (when I had another meeting starting, he actually contacted the person leading that meeting to tell them I’ll be late) Any advice on what to do here? Any chance I can get away with just skipping every other meeting?

Interestingly, when I joined this team, I asked questions about the work-from-home policy and they informed me they all stay home, they keep work and home life separate, they don’t hang out after work, and they don’t share their personal phone numbers. Someone even said, “So we aren’t going to be outside-of-work friends, ya know.” I assumed that meant I was joining a very mellow, low-contact team, which is what I was looking for after coming from a place that needed to spend every single working minute together. This team is unfortunately starting to feel really similar.

Yeah, it sounds like the culture on your team has changed a bit since you started. I’m curious about why! Did someone more social join the team and change the vibe? Did people start to feel more isolated at home over time and so began ramping up the socialization at work? It’s not really the point of your letter, but it’s an interesting evolution.

You’re right that the easiest way to solve the problem of being hunted down to socialize in the office is to stop going in as much, since that’s an option available to you. But there are downsides to that: you might lose out on conversations and visibility that would benefit you to have, and you might sometimes have work that’s easier to do from there. So it’ll also help to work on getting more comfortable speaking up and setting the boundaries you want to have, whether that’s “I’m going to stay here for lunch today” (and deciding to just be okay with it people are disappointed by that) or “sorry, can’t talk today — I’ve got to focus on finishing X while I’m here.”

As for the weekly hour-long video calls: they’re supposed to be optional, so try treating them as optional! Attend every second one, or every third one. If people comment on it, say, “I had something I needed to finish up today” or “Oh, I think they’re optional so I used the time for something I had to get done.”

But also, since you said it seems like most people are uncomfortable with the calls, why not ask around and see if you can gin up support for shortening them or holding them less frequently? In some teams, you could raise it on the call itself: “what do you all think about moving these to every other week or making them shorter? I know they’re optional but personally I end up feeling like I should attend because others are, and if other people feel that way too, every other week might be a more manageable frequency.”

The post if I work in the office, everyone just wants to socialize appeared first on Ask a Manager.